AI 排行榜
哪个模型综合领先，以及各类别的表现。这些是公开基准测评，YouTube 和 X 上的各种榜单图表均源于此。我们不发布任何自有评分：每一个数字都归属于产出它的基准测评，标注采集日期并回溯至原始来源。
Real people are shown the same prompt answered by two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer. Millions of these blind head-to-head votes are fed into a Bradley-Terry statistical model (the successor to the Elo system it started with) which converts win/loss pairs into a single rating per model. A higher rating means people picked that model more often against strong opposition. This snapshot uses the 'style control' variant, which is the site's default: it statistically adjusts for answer length and formatting so a model cannot climb simply by writing longer, prettier replies.
局限性: It measures which answer people LIKE, not which answer is CORRECT - a confident, well-written wrong answer can still win a vote. Voters are self-selected volunteers rather than a representative sample, prompts skew toward what that crowd chooses to type, and models with few votes have wide confidence intervals (ci_low/ci_high) that often overlap the models ranked above and below them. Treat small rank gaps as ties.
来源: LMArena (formerly LMSYS Chatbot Arena) ↗ · 已发布 2026-08-11 · 底层数据 ↗ · Dataset released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Reuse is permitted with attribution - credit LMArena and link to the leaderboard.
| # | 模型 | 组织 | Arena score (human preference) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | claude-fable-5 | Anthropic | 1506 95% CI 1501 to 1512 21,304 votes |
| 2 | claude-opus-4-6-thinking | Anthropic | 1505 95% CI 1501 to 1508 72,425 votes |
| 3 | claude-opus-4-7-thinking | Anthropic | 1502 95% CI 1498 to 1506 60,222 votes |
| 4 | muse-spark-1.2 (xHigh) | Meta | 1498 95% CI 1488 to 1509 3,278 votes |
| 5 | claude-opus-4-6 | Anthropic | 1498 95% CI 1494 to 1501 76,386 votes |
| 6 | claude-opus-5-high | Anthropic | 1494 95% CI 1489 to 1499 19,498 votes |
| 7 | claude-opus-4-7 | Anthropic | 1494 95% CI 1490 to 1498 61,308 votes |
| 8 | claude-opus-5-max | Anthropic | 1490 95% CI 1483 to 1497 9,419 votes |
| 9 | qwen3.8-max | Alibaba | 1490 95% CI 1482 to 1498 6,789 votes |
| 10 | muse-spark-1.1 | Meta | 1489 95% CI 1483 to 1494 16,648 votes |
| 11 | muse-spark | Meta | 1488 95% CI 1482 to 1494 13,600 votes |
| 12 | kimi-k3-max | Moonshot AI | 1487 95% CI 1481 to 1493 11,762 votes |
| 13 | gemini-3.1-pro-preview | 1486 95% CI 1483 to 1490 94,814 votes | |
| 14 | gemini-3-pro | 1486 95% CI 1482 to 1489 41,509 votes | |
| 15 | gemini-3.6-flash | 1484 95% CI 1478 to 1490 13,559 votes | |
| 16 | gpt-5.5-high | OpenAI | 1482 95% CI 1477 to 1486 55,210 votes |
| 17 | claude-opus-4-8-thinking | Anthropic | 1481 95% CI 1477 to 1486 40,409 votes |
| 18 | gpt-5.6-sol-xhigh | OpenAI | 1481 95% CI 1475 to 1487 15,304 votes |
| 19 | gemini-3.5-flash-high | 1477 95% CI 1473 to 1482 25,613 votes | |
| 20 | gpt-5.5 | OpenAI | 1477 95% CI 1473 to 1481 56,513 votes |
柱状图按可见范围缩放，以保持细微差异的可读性，起点不为零。置信区间存在重叠时，各模型在统计上处于并列状态，请将顶部组视为一个整体，而非严格排名。
如何解读这些结果，以及为何各方结论不一致
LMArena (formerly LMSYS Chatbot Arena)
Real people are shown the same prompt answered by two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer. Millions of these blind head-to-head votes are fed into a Bradley-Terry statistical model (the successor to the Elo system it started with) which converts win/loss pairs into a single rating per model. A higher rating means people picked that model more often against strong opposition. This snapshot uses the 'style control' variant, which is the site's default: it statistically adjusts for answer length and formatting so a model cannot climb simply by writing longer, prettier replies.
注意: It measures which answer people LIKE, not which answer is CORRECT - a confident, well-written wrong answer can still win a vote. Voters are self-selected volunteers rather than a representative sample, prompts skew toward what that crowd chooses to type, and models with few votes have wide confidence intervals (ci_low/ci_high) that often overlap the models ranked above and below them. Treat small rank gaps as ties.
已发布 2026-08-11 · 实时排行榜 ↗ · Data: LMArena leaderboard dataset (CC BY 4.0).
LiveBench
A fixed set of test questions with objectively verifiable answers is run against each model and scored automatically against ground truth - no human voting and no AI judge, so the score is repeatable. This release spans 23 tasks grouped into 7 categories. Each category score is the average of its tasks, and the headline 'global average' is the average of the 7 category scores, so every category counts equally regardless of how many tasks it contains. Scores are percentages: 100 is perfect.
注意: Contamination-LIMITED, not contamination-proof: questions are refreshed from recent sources to reduce the chance a model simply memorised them during training, but that cannot be guaranteed. Scores reflect only these 23 tasks - they say nothing about tone, safety, speed or cost. Many entries are effort/thinking variants of the same underlying model (model_id shows the exact configuration tested), and a variant given more reasoning budget will usually outscore the cheaper default that most people actually use.
已发布 · 实时排行榜 ↗ · Data: LiveBench 2026-06-25 release, livebench.ai.
两种不同的单位，绝不合并为一张图表
人工偏好评分与正确率不能共用同一坐标轴，因此本页不会将两者混在同一张表中。一个模型可能在其中一项领先，却在另一项落后，这是真实的信号，说明它各自擅长什么，而非自相矛盾：前者问的是"人们更偏好哪个答案？"，后者问的是"哪个答案是正确的？"
本页面不会做的事
它不会告诉你该用哪个 AI。基准测试榜首往往并非最适合你工作的工具，价格、可用性、集成能力、上下文长度，以及它对你指令的遵从程度，通常比一两分的差距更重要。 我该用哪个 AI？ →