AI identity và AI team của bạn, portable trên mọi nền tảng AI.
Đăng nhập Bắt đầu
Menu
Xây dựng Agent of Me Khám phá Phong cách Professional Agents Agent cộng đồng Bảng xếp hạng Tin tức AI
Nền tảng AI Danh mục Model Matrix So sánh Tôi nên dùng AI nào? Hướng dẫn tích hợp Thiết lập OpenClaw Prompt Fit
Học & Công cụ Học Hỏi dữ liệu Agent Builder API
Giới thiệu Về chúng tôi Liên hệ Tuyên bố miễn trách
Đăng nhập Bắt đầu
Tài khoản
AI identity của bạn, mang đi được

Tạo tài khoản miễn phí để xây dựng profile của bạn. Mặc định riêng tư. Không có gì được chia sẻ trừ khi bạn tự công bố.

Bắt đầu Đăng nhập
Chế độ tối

🧭 Chế độ hướng dẫn
Chưa quen với prompt, system instruction, context window, token? Chúng tôi giải thích từng thuật ngữ ngay khi bạn duyệt, bằng ngôn ngữ dễ hiểu. Cùng một trang, tích hợp sẵn phần hướng dẫn.

⚡ Chế độ chuyên gia
Bạn đã biết cách prompting hoạt động. Chỉ phần nội dung thực chất, gọn gàng và súc tích, không có giải thích thêm. Đây là chế độ xem mặc định.

Ngôn ngữ giao diện

Prompt Systems & Agents · Phần 5/5, Portability and Testing

Mục tiêu học tập
Nhấn Next (hoặc dùng phím mũi tên) để chuyển từng ý một. Không giới hạn thời gian, bài kiểm tra 5 câu chờ ở cuối. Mũi tên ← ở trên cùng thoát bất cứ lúc nào; tiến trình được giữ lại.

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Câu đố nhanh, Portability and Testing

5 câu hỏi, được rút ngẫu nhiên từ ngân hàng đề mỗi lần thử. Điểm đạt 60%. Làm lại không giới hạn.

Sẵn sàng cho bài kiểm tra cuối khóa →
Đọc toàn bộ văn bản bài học

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Doanh nghiệp

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

Tài chính

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

Pháp lý

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

Marketing

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

Cá nhân

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

Bất động sản

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

Nghiên cứu

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

Công nghệ

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer