Je AI-identiteit en je AI-team, overdraagbaar naar elk AI-platform.
Inloggen Aan de slag
Menu
Bouw een Agent of Me Stijlen verkennen Professionele agents Community-agents Leaderboard AI-nieuws
AI-platforms Directory Model Matrix Vergelijken Welke AI moet ik gebruiken? Integratiehandleidingen OpenClaw instellen Prompt Fit
Leren & Tools Leren Stel de data een vraag Agent Builder API
Over Over ons Contact Disclaimers
Inloggen Aan de slag
Account
Jouw AI-identiteit, altijd mee

Maak een gratis account aan om je profiel te bouwen. Standaard privé. Er wordt niets gedeeld tenzij jij het publiceert.

Aan de slag Inloggen
Donkere modus

🧭 Begeleid overzicht
Nieuw met prompts, systeminstructies, contextvensters, tokens? We leggen elk begrip uit terwijl je bladert, in begrijpelijke taal. Dezelfde pagina's, met de uitleg ingebouwd.

⚡ Expertoverzicht
Je weet hoe prompting werkt. Gewoon de kern, helder en compact, zonder extra uitleg. Dit is de standaardweergave.

Interfacetaal

Prompt Systems & Agents · Sectie 5/5, Portability and Testing

Leerdoelen
Druk op Volgende (of gebruik de pijltjestoetsen) om idee voor idee verder te gaan. Geen timer, de quiz met 5 vragen wacht aan het einde. De ← bovenaan sluit op elk moment af; voortgang wordt bewaard.

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Miniquiz, Portability and Testing

5 vragen, vers getrokken uit de bank bij elke poging. Slagingsgrens 60%. Onbeperkte herkansingen.

Klaar voor de eindtoets →
Lees de volledige lestekst

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Bedrijfsleven

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

Finance

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

Juridisch

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

Marketing

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

Persoonlijk

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

Vastgoed

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

Onderzoek

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

Technologie

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer