나의 AI 정체성과 AI 팀을 모든 AI 플랫폼에서 그대로 사용하세요.
로그인 시작하기
메뉴
Agent of Me 만들기 스타일 탐색 전문 에이전트 커뮤니티 에이전트 리더보드 AI 뉴스
AI 플랫폼 디렉터리 Model Matrix 비교 어떤 AI를 사용해야 하나요? 연동 가이드 OpenClaw 설정 Prompt Fit
학습 및 도구 학습 데이터에 질문하기 에이전트 빌더 API
소개 회사 소개 문의 면책 조항
로그인 시작하기
계정
이식 가능한 AI 정체성

무료 계정을 만들어 프로필을 구축하세요. 기본적으로 비공개입니다. 직접 공개하지 않는 한 아무것도 공유되지 않습니다.

시작하기 로그인
다크 모드

🧭 가이드 보기
프롬프트, 시스템 지침, 컨텍스트 윈도우, 토큰이 처음이신가요? 모든 용어를 쉬운 설명으로 탐색하면서 익힐 수 있습니다. 동일한 페이지에 도움말이 내장되어 있습니다.

⚡ 전문가 보기
프롬프트 작동 방식은 이미 알고 계시죠. 군더더기 없이, 핵심만 간결하게. 기본 보기입니다.

인터페이스 언어

Prompt Systems & Agents · 섹션 5/5, Portability and Testing

학습 목표
다음을 탭하거나(또는 방향키를 사용하여) 한 번에 하나씩 이동하세요. 제한 시간 없음, 5문제 퀴즈는 마지막에 있습니다. 상단의 ← 로 언제든지 나갈 수 있으며, 진행 상황은 저장됩니다.

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

미니 퀴즈, Portability and Testing

5 질문은 매 시도마다 문제 은행에서 새로 출제됩니다. 합격 기준 60%. 재시도 횟수 제한 없음.

최종 테스트 준비 완료 →
레슨 전체 텍스트 읽기

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

기업

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

금융

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

법률

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

마케팅

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

개인

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

부동산

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

리서치

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

기술

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer