あなたのAI identityとAIチームを、あらゆるAIプラットフォームにそのまま持ち込める。
サインイン はじめる
メニュー
Agent of Me を作成 スタイルを探索 プロフェッショナルエージェント コミュニティエージェント リーダーボード AIニュース
AIプラットフォーム ディレクトリ Model Matrix 比較 どのAIを使えばいいですか? インテグレーションガイド OpenClawをセットアップ Prompt Fit
学ぶ・ツール 学ぶ データに質問する エージェントビルダー API
概要 サイトについて お問い合わせ 免責事項
サインイン はじめる
アカウント
持ち運べるAI identity

無料アカウントを作成してプロフィールを構築しましょう。デフォルトは非公開。あなたが公開しない限り、何も共有されません。

はじめる サインイン
ダークモード

🧭 ガイドビュー
プロンプト、システム指示、コンテキストウィンドウ、トークンが初めてですか?このサイトを閲覧しながら、すべての用語をわかりやすい言葉で説明します。ヘルプが組み込まれた同じページで確認できます。

⚡ エキスパートビュー
プロンプトの仕組みはわかっている前提で。余計な説明なし、要点だけをコンパクトに。これがデフォルト表示。

表示言語

Prompt Systems & Agents · セクション 5/5, Portability and Testing

学習目標
Nextをタップ(または矢印キーを使用)して、ひとつずつ進めてください。タイマーはなく、5問のクイズは最後に待っています。上部の←でいつでも終了できます。進捗は保持されます。

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

ミニクイズ, Portability and Testing

5 問題(毎回バンクからランダム出題)。合格ライン60%。受験回数無制限。

最終テストの準備完了 →
レッスン全文を読む

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

企業

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

ファイナンス

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

法律

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

マーケティング

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

個人

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

不動産

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

リサーチ

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

情報技術

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer