Tu identidad de AI y tu equipo de AI, portables a cualquier plataforma de AI.
Iniciar sesión Comenzar
Menú
Crear un Agent of Me Explorar estilos Agentes Profesionales Agentes de la comunidad Clasificación Noticias de IA
Plataformas de IA Directorio Model Matrix Comparar ¿Qué AI debería usar? Guías de integración Configurar OpenClaw Prompt Fit
Aprender y Herramientas Aprender Consulta los datos Agent Builder API
Acerca de Sobre nosotros Contacto Avisos legales
Iniciar sesión Comenzar
Cuenta
Tu identidad AI, portable

Crea una cuenta gratuita para construir tu perfil. Privado por defecto. Nada se comparte a menos que lo publiques.

Comenzar Iniciar sesión
Modo oscuro

🧭 Vista guiada
¿Nuevo en prompts, instrucciones de sistema, ventanas de contexto, tokens? Explicamos cada término mientras navegas, en lenguaje claro. Las mismas páginas, con la ayuda incorporada.

⚡ Vista experta
Ya sabes cómo funciona el prompting. Solo lo esencial, claro y compacto, sin explicaciones de más. Esta es la vista por defecto.

Idioma de la interfaz

Prompt Systems & Agents · Sección 5/5, Portability and Testing

Objetivos de aprendizaje
Pulsa Siguiente (o usa las teclas de flecha) para avanzar una idea a la vez. Sin límite de tiempo; el cuestionario de 5 preguntas te espera al final. La ← de arriba sale en cualquier momento; el progreso se guarda.

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Mini quiz, Portability and Testing

5 preguntas, seleccionadas del banco en cada intento. Nota mínima 60%. Reintentos ilimitados.

Listo para la prueba final →
Leer el texto completo de la lección

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Empresas

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

Finanzas

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

Legal

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

Marketing

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

Personal

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

Inmobiliario

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

Investigación

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

Tecnología

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer