Deine AI-Identität und dein AI-Team, portabel für jede AI-Plattform.
Anmelden Loslegen
Menü
Einen Agent of Me erstellen Stile erkunden Professionelle Agenten Community-Agents Leaderboard KI-News
KI-Plattformen Verzeichnis Model Matrix Vergleichen Welche KI sollte ich verwenden? Integrationsleitfäden OpenClaw einrichten Prompt Fit
Lernen & Tools Lernen Daten befragen Agent Builder API
Über Über uns Kontakt Haftungsausschlüsse
Anmelden Loslegen
Konto
Deine KI-Identität, portabel

Erstelle ein kostenloses Konto, um dein Profil aufzubauen. Standardmäßig privat. Nichts wird geteilt, es sei denn, du veröffentlichst es.

Loslegen Anmelden
Dunkelmodus

🧭 Geführte Ansicht
Neu bei Prompts, System Instructions, Context Windows, Tokens? Wir erklären jeden Begriff beim Stöbern verständlich. Dieselben Seiten, mit integrierter Hilfe.

⚡ Expertenansicht
Du weißt, wie Prompting funktioniert. Nur das Wesentliche, klar und kompakt, ohne zusätzliche Erklärungen. Das ist die Standardansicht.

Oberflächensprache

Prompt Systems & Agents · Abschnitt 5/5, Portability and Testing

Lernziele
Tippe auf Weiter (oder nutze die Pfeiltasten), um eine Idee nach der anderen zu sehen. Kein Timer, das Quiz mit 5 Fragen wartet am Ende. Der ← oben beendet jederzeit; der Fortschritt bleibt erhalten.

Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Mini-Quiz, Portability and Testing

5 Fragen, bei jedem Versuch frisch aus dem Pool gezogen. Bestehensgrenze 60 %. Unbegrenzte Wiederholungen.

Bereit für den Abschlusstest →
Den vollständigen Lektionstext lesen

1. Same prompt, different model, different behavior

A prompt is not a program; it is interpreted by whichever model reads it. Move it and the usual suspects shift: VERBOSITY, one model's 'brief' is another's page. LITERALISM, one treats 'around five bullets' as exactly five, another as seven. FORMATTING HABITS, default headings, bullets, bold and tables differ by house style.

What tends to carry: explicit structure, named constraints, worked examples, definitions of done. What tends to break: everything you never said out loud, the behaviors you got from one model's defaults and mistook for obedience to your prompt.

2. Writing model-agnostic instructions

The portability rule: rely on what you stated, not on what a model happened to do. If you like the tight answers you are getting, write 'under 150 words' anyway. The current model's default is doing that work for you, and defaults are exactly what changes in a move.

Prefer universal instructions over model-specific tricks: numbers over adjectives, structure over vibe, examples over descriptions of tone, and a stated fallback ('if a section does not apply, write N/A'). A prompt written this way reads slightly over-specified on any single model, and that surplus is precisely what survives the move.

3. A test set of 3-5 representative tasks

You cannot judge a prompt change from one output, single outputs vary. Keep a fixed test set instead: three to five real tasks that span the agent's range, each with a written pass criterion. For a research agent: one easy lookup, one ambiguous request that should trigger a clarifying question, one task whose honest answer is 'unknown', one full-length standard job.

The written criteria make it a test rather than a viewing: 'asks about jurisdiction before answering', 'output contains all four contract sections', 'says unknown rather than inventing a figure'. They also make A/B honest: run the same tasks through the old and new prompt, compare against the criteria, keep the winner.

4. Version, changelog, and when to re-test

Prompts you rely on deserve the boring disciplines: a version number, a one-line changelog entry per change, and no silent edits. It is the same habit as agent versioning, extended to everything load-bearing, profiles, templates and agents alike.

Re-test on three triggers: the model behind your platform updates, you move a prompt to a new platform or model, or outputs start feeling off. Ten minutes through the test set answers what speculation cannot: did MY tasks change? Version, changelog, test set, the difference between having prompts and having a prompt system.

Konjunktur

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

Finanzen

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

Rechtliches

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

Marketing

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

Persönlich

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

Immobilien

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

Recherche

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

Technologie

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer