나의 AI 정체성과 AI 팀을 모든 AI 플랫폼에서 그대로 사용하세요.
로그인 시작하기
메뉴
Agent of Me 만들기 스타일 탐색 전문 에이전트 커뮤니티 에이전트 리더보드 AI 뉴스
AI 플랫폼 디렉터리 Model Matrix 비교 어떤 AI를 사용해야 하나요? 연동 가이드 OpenClaw 설정 Prompt Fit
학습 및 도구 학습 데이터에 질문하기 에이전트 빌더 API
소개 회사 소개 문의 면책 조항
로그인 시작하기
계정
이식 가능한 AI 정체성

무료 계정을 만들어 프로필을 구축하세요. 기본적으로 비공개입니다. 직접 공개하지 않는 한 아무것도 공유되지 않습니다.

시작하기 로그인
다크 모드

🧭 가이드 보기
프롬프트, 시스템 지침, 컨텍스트 윈도우, 토큰이 처음이신가요? 모든 용어를 쉬운 설명으로 탐색하면서 익힐 수 있습니다. 동일한 페이지에 도움말이 내장되어 있습니다.

⚡ 전문가 보기
프롬프트 작동 방식은 이미 알고 계시죠. 군더더기 없이, 핵심만 간결하게. 기본 보기입니다.

인터페이스 언어

Prompt Systems & Agents · 섹션 2/5, Designing a Specialist

학습 목표
다음을 탭하거나(또는 방향키를 사용하여) 한 번에 하나씩 이동하세요. 제한 시간 없음, 5문제 퀴즈는 마지막에 있습니다. 상단의 ← 로 언제든지 나갈 수 있으며, 진행 상황은 저장됩니다.

A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

미니 퀴즈, Designing a Specialist

5 질문은 매 시도마다 문제 은행에서 새로 출제됩니다. 합격 기준 60%. 재시도 횟수 제한 없음.

다음 섹션: Composing Profile + Specialist →
레슨 전체 텍스트 읽기

1. A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

2. Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

3. Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

4. Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

기업

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

금융

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

법률

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

마케팅

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

개인

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

부동산

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

리서치

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

기술

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer