あなたのAI identityとAIチームを、あらゆるAIプラットフォームにそのまま持ち込める。
サインイン はじめる
メニュー
Agent of Me を作成 スタイルを探索 プロフェッショナルエージェント コミュニティエージェント リーダーボード AIニュース
AIプラットフォーム ディレクトリ Model Matrix 比較 どのAIを使えばいいですか? インテグレーションガイド OpenClawをセットアップ Prompt Fit
学ぶ・ツール 学ぶ データに質問する エージェントビルダー API
概要 サイトについて お問い合わせ 免責事項
サインイン はじめる
アカウント
持ち運べるAI identity

無料アカウントを作成してプロフィールを構築しましょう。デフォルトは非公開。あなたが公開しない限り、何も共有されません。

はじめる サインイン
ダークモード

🧭 ガイドビュー
プロンプト、システム指示、コンテキストウィンドウ、トークンが初めてですか?このサイトを閲覧しながら、すべての用語をわかりやすい言葉で説明します。ヘルプが組み込まれた同じページで確認できます。

⚡ エキスパートビュー
プロンプトの仕組みはわかっている前提で。余計な説明なし、要点だけをコンパクトに。これがデフォルト表示。

表示言語

Prompt Systems & Agents · セクション 2/5, Designing a Specialist

学習目標
Nextをタップ(または矢印キーを使用)して、ひとつずつ進めてください。タイマーはなく、5問のクイズは最後に待っています。上部の←でいつでも終了できます。進捗は保持されます。

A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

ミニクイズ, Designing a Specialist

5 問題(毎回バンクからランダム出題)。合格ライン60%。受験回数無制限。

次のセクション: Composing Profile + Specialist →
レッスン全文を読む

1. A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

2. Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

3. Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

4. Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

企業

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

ファイナンス

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

法律

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

マーケティング

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

個人

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

不動産

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

リサーチ

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

情報技術

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer