Tu identidad de AI y tu equipo de AI, portables a cualquier plataforma de AI.
Iniciar sesión Comenzar
Menú
Crear un Agent of Me Explorar estilos Agentes Profesionales Agentes de la comunidad Clasificación Noticias de IA
Plataformas de IA Directorio Model Matrix Comparar ¿Qué AI debería usar? Guías de integración Configurar OpenClaw Prompt Fit
Aprender y Herramientas Aprender Consulta los datos Agent Builder API
Acerca de Sobre nosotros Contacto Avisos legales
Iniciar sesión Comenzar
Cuenta
Tu identidad AI, portable

Crea una cuenta gratuita para construir tu perfil. Privado por defecto. Nada se comparte a menos que lo publiques.

Comenzar Iniciar sesión
Modo oscuro

🧭 Vista guiada
¿Nuevo en prompts, instrucciones de sistema, ventanas de contexto, tokens? Explicamos cada término mientras navegas, en lenguaje claro. Las mismas páginas, con la ayuda incorporada.

⚡ Vista experta
Ya sabes cómo funciona el prompting. Solo lo esencial, claro y compacto, sin explicaciones de más. Esta es la vista por defecto.

Idioma de la interfaz

Prompt Systems & Agents · Sección 2/5, Designing a Specialist

Objetivos de aprendizaje
Pulsa Siguiente (o usa las teclas de flecha) para avanzar una idea a la vez. Sin límite de tiempo; el cuestionario de 5 preguntas te espera al final. La ← de arriba sale en cualquier momento; el progreso se guarda.

A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

Mini quiz, Designing a Specialist

5 preguntas, seleccionadas del banco en cada intento. Nota mínima 60%. Reintentos ilimitados.

Siguiente sección: Composing Profile + Specialist →
Leer el texto completo de la lección

1. A job description, not a costume

An agent prompt is a reusable specialist: instructions that define a job, saved once, invoked whenever the job comes up. The complete design has five parts. ROLE: what the specialist is and is not. WORKFLOW: the steps it follows, in order. REQUIRED INPUTS: what it must be given, or must ask for, before starting. OUTPUT CONTRACT: the exact shape of what comes back. GUARDRAILS: what it never does, plus any disclaimers its domain demands.

Miss a part and the failure is predictable. No workflow: plausible but unmethodical answers. No required inputs: confident work built on guesses. No output contract: a different shape every time. No guardrails: the one bad day that makes you stop trusting it.

2. Why structure beats role-play

'You are an experienced contract lawyer' is a costume. It shifts vocabulary and confidence, mostly confidence, while the underlying work stays whatever the model felt like doing. The costume version sounds more expert without being more careful.

The structured version defines the work: 'Review the contract clause by clause. For each flagged clause: quote it, name the risk, rate severity, propose alternative wording. Ask for the governing jurisdiction if it is not stated. End with the three clauses to negotiate first, and note that this is not legal advice.' Same domain, but now the expertise is a procedure you can verify and improve.

3. Guardrails and worked examples

Guardrails are the never-do rules that hold on the bad day: 'never invent a citation', 'never state a deadline without naming its source', 'always include the not-legal-advice line'. Write them from failures you have seen or can predict. Each guardrail should have a story. Domains with real stakes (legal, medical, financial) also need their standing disclaimer built in, not remembered per prompt.

Then pin the behavior with one worked example: a sample input and the exact output you want for it, inside the agent prompt. You know why from earlier courses, patterns hold better than descriptions. One example tunes tone, depth and format at once, and each new failure mode becomes a new example or a new guardrail.

4. Version your agents

The first version of any agent is a hypothesis. You will meet inputs you did not predict and outputs that drift from the contract. So treat the prompt like the small piece of infrastructure it is: number the versions, change one thing at a time, keep one line per version on what changed and why.

The discipline pays off the first time an agent gets worse. With versions, you compare v4 against v3 and find the line that caused it; without them you are rewriting from memory. Versioning also makes agents shareable, a teammate can adopt v5 and report problems against something specific.

Empresas

Business AnalystChief of StaffExecutive AssistantM&A AnalystManagement ConsultantOperations AnalystProject ManagerRecruiter

Finanzas

AccountantDue Diligence AnalystEquity Research AnalystFamily Office AnalystFinancial AnalystFixed Income AnalystInvestment Banking AnalystPortfolio Analyst

Legal

Contract Review AssistantLegal Due Diligence AssistantLegal Research AssistantParalegal

Marketing

Brand StrategistContent StrategistGEO AnalystMarketing StrategistSEO AnalystSales Strategist

Personal

Career CoachLearning TutorReflection AssistantResearch AssistantTravel PlannerWriting Assistant

Inmobiliario

Acquisition AnalystAsset Management AnalystCommercial Real Estate AnalystDevelopment AnalystLease AnalystProperty Financial Analyst

Investigación

Competitive Intelligence AnalystDeep Research AnalystIndustry Research AnalystJournalist ResearcherMarket Research AnalystMedical Research Assistant

Tecnología

AI Strategy AdvisorCybersecurity Research AssistantData AnalystProduct ManagerSoftware Engineer